With Google jumping headfirst into the mobile phone industry, other big IT companies are — wisely — following suit. CNet news is reporting that Microsoft has purchased Danger, the Palo Alto-based manufacturer of the T-Mobile Sidekick smart phone. In a statement released recently, Microsoft confirmed that Danger had been acquired for an undisclosed amount.
Microsoft entertainment president Robbie Bach called Danger “a perfect complement to our existing software and services.” Bach did not reveal Microsoft’s plans for rebranding the companny’s smartphones, or how they would be implemented with existing Microsoft software and hardware solutions.
Danger has made quite a name for themselves in the past few years; the company’s Sidekick smart phone brings Web browsing, instant messaging and e-mail to a consumer oriented cell phone that is geared more toward the youth market than its closest rival, Blackberry, who focuses almost exclusively on business users.
But in some ways Microsoft’s acquisition of the Sidekick is an unusual move. The company uses its own proprietary operating system, instead of the more ubiquitous Windows Mobile. Additionally, the company (Danger) has a very different M.O. from the conservative Microsoft camp. Analysts expect that Microsoft will “reengineer” the sidekick to use some version of its Microsoft Mobile operating system, though company representatives have not confirmed this fact to date.
Microsoft did announce that they are in negotiations with both Motorola and Sharp to manufacture phones for Danger. Both Motorola and Sharp have experience in producing phones using the Windows Mobile operating system.
Microsoft is about to receive substantial competition to Windows mobile, however, as Google is officially introducing its Android mobile operating system recently at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, Spain. Google has already garnered the support of many of the biggest players in the mobile industry for its new operating system, which is being touted by some as “the Windows killer.”
After Microsoft’s failed attempt to acquire Yahoo.com last week, it is clear that a major power play is transpiring among the biggest IT companies. Microsoft’s acquisition of Danger is another sign of the company’s intention to grab a sizable chunk of the mobile Internet pie.
When all is said and done, the power play taking place is principally between Microsoft and Google. Only these two giants have the funding and organization to dominate the coming mobile Internet boom. But even with the acquisition of Danger, Microsoft is still trailing behind Google in the new mobile Internet goldrush — at least for the time being.
Related Business Directory Categories:
Microsoft’s attempt to buy out Yahoo Inc. for $44.6 billion is a firm testament to the continuing profitability of online advertising. With some economists talking “recession” and the stock market reacting unpredictably over the last few weeks, online advertising continues to show robust growth thanks to companies like Google, Yahoo and Microsoft.
And whether Microsoft prevails in acquiring Yahoo or not, online advertising is considered to be a booming growth area that shows no sign of decline, even if other areas of the economy seemed uncertain right now. The Interactive Advertising Bureau is reporting that online advertising in the United States grew by more than 25% in 2007. And analysts are confident that there’s plenty of room for additional growth.
Currently, online advertising is less than 10% of all US advertisement spending. However, Americans are spending more and more time online– some surveys show that the average American receives 20% of their media “intake” from the Internet, showing that the potential for growth in online advertising is vast.
Crucially, advertising online also provides advertisers with tracking and performance tools that are unheard of in the off-line world. An advertiser can determine exactly which ads are profitable, which demographic they appeal to, and easily A/B test two ads to determine which is most profitable. This kind of exacting performance tracking appeals to many advertisers, especially those in smaller niche markets who are seeking very specific consumers.
And unlike television, newspaper or radio advertising, with online ads, advertisers only pay a fee when a Web surfer actually clicks on their ad. This means that under-performing ads have lower costs, allowing advertisers to experiment and increase their overall ad spend. This would be the equivalent of running a television commercial that you didn’t have to pay for when the viewer got up to go to the kitchen on the commercial break.
The level of control, user tracking and nonpayment for un-clicked ads make online advertising (or “pay per click advertising) a great value for businesses seeking customers online. It also levels the playing field greatly between Fortune 500 corporations and home-based start ups.
For example, if you search online for “greeting cards,” you will find ads by the biggest names in the greeting card industry, like Hallmark. But you’ll also find ads from small “cottage industry” suppliers and even home-based micro businesses — all competing together for the same consumer.
Is this kind of egalitarian culture, along with the reasonable startup fees, that attracts many advertisers to the Internet, the experts agree that there still plenty of room for growth in the burgeoning online advertising industry.
Related Business Directory Categories:
Comments